Corporate Litigation Attorney| Commercial Litigation Attorney | Anderson Kill P.C.

Paul M. Kaplan

Shareholder
New York

Paul M. Kaplan is a shareholder in Anderson Kill’s New York office.  Paul focuses his practice on Corporate and Commercial Litigation, including business litigation and dispute resolution, antitrust litigation and counseling, class action defense, and white collar defense and criminal investigations.  He represents domestic and foreign financial institutions and corporations and their Directors and Officers in federal and state litigation and regulatory matters.  He counsels corporations on the antitrust ramifications of business transactions with a view to avoiding or minimizing exposure to antitrust claims in litigation and represents financial institutions and corporations facing regulatory or court enforcement actions.  He has represented corporations and senior executives in federal and state government investigations involving both criminal and civil matters.

He has represented clients in financial services, telecommunications, health care and medical devices, consumer goods and electronics, college and amateur sports, automotive parts, university book stores and natural resources.

Paul is the co-chair of Anderson Kill's Antitrust and Unfair Competition practice group.

Read More

Professional Memberships

Member, American Bar Association; Member, Clayton Act Committee, Section of Antitrust Law; Member, Association of the Bar of the City of New York; Member, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Committee (1995-1998; 2016-2017) Member, Banking Law Committee (1992-1995); Member, The London School of Economics' New York Development Committee (1999-2001).

Board Memberships

Vice President, America-Israel Friendship League (AIFL); Board of Directors, Executive and Law (Pro Bono) Committees, AIFL; Member, Boston University College of Arts & Sciences Dean’s Advisory Board; Member, Board of the American Friends of Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Member, Board of the American Fund, The London School of Economics (2016-Present).

Paul is a four-time finisher of the New York City Marathon, with a best time of 3:48.31.

·      Japanese Auto Parts Investigation by the Department of Justice, Antitrust DivisionIn a price fixing and bid rigging criminal antitrust investigation, represented a senior executive employed by a foreign auto parts manufacturer in a federal, criminal antitrust investigation.  The investigation involves allegations that the company participated in a conspiracy with competitors to fix prices and rig bids for auto parts sold in the U.S.  The Plea Agreement and Judgment are public documents.  Paul secured a “carve in” status for the client resulting in his non-prosecution and grant of immunity.  Twenty-six Japanese executives have received jail sentences as a result of the Japanese Auto Parts Investigation, the largest investigation in the history of the Department of Justice.  Over $2.4 billion in criminal antitrust fines have been secured against all of the auto parts manufacturers since 2013.

·     Darush v. Revision and Lovely Skin, U.S. District for the Central District of California (Judge Gary Feess) – Represented Defendant, Lovely Skin, in a price fixing claim under California’s Antitrust statute, the Cartwright Act.  After we secured our first Motion to Dismiss, the Plaintiff was given leave to amend his claim, which he did.  The case was then settled for a nominal amount.

·      In Re Polyurethane Antitrust Litigation (MDL Docket No. 2196), U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (2010-) (Judge Jack Zouhary) – Representing Defendant, Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co., in a price fixing and allocation of customer case:  Two class actions, involving the direct and indirect plaintiffs, along with the opt out and direct plaintiffs.  Ongoing litigation.

·      Genesis Corp. v. Solomon-Page (2011-2012) – Actions in New York State Supreme Court and U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York involving a business dispute between two competitors. Claims under the Lanham Act, and in contract and tort.  Case was settled.

·      Macquaire Group Ltd. v. Pacific Corporate Group, LLC, 2009 WL 539928 (2009) U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California (Judge Irma Gonzalez) – Defended Macquaire Chairman, CEO and the five most senior officers in a business dispute with a former joint venture partner.  Plaintiff’s claims were as high as $100 million, but after Defendants’ four counterclaims survived Plaintiffs’ MTD, the parties settled the case.  This was a significant victory for the client in federal and state civil litigations in California.  In order to counter claim against the Plaintiffs, four separate claims were asserted, which survived an Iqbal/Twombly Motion to Dismiss.  This motion requires a heightened pleading standard as set down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

·      Acquisition of Dialysis Corp. of America by US Rental CareRepresented Dialysis Corp. of America in a $120 million transaction in 2010.  The transaction was approved by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission within 20 days.

·      Mountain West Football Conference Presented testimony to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on the Antitrust violations of the college football structure, the BCS, in 2009.

·      The Book Exchange v. Barnes & Noble College Booksellers (2008), In The Circuit Court of Monongalia County, West Virginia – Defended Barnes & Noble Booksellers in a price fixing and a consumer protection case that resulted in or Motion to Dismiss being granted with prejudice.

·      Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. v. Glen Billing, U.S. Supreme Court (2007) – Submitted Amicus Curiae Brief in support of Petitioner for W. R. Hambrecht + Co., LLC arguing for antitrust immunity for permissible underwriting conduct.

EDUCATION

London School of Economics, University of London, LL.M.
Northeastern University School of Law, J.D.
Boston University, College of Arts & Sciences Trustee Scholar, A.B., cum laude with distinction

BAR ADMISSIONS

New York and Massachusetts

COURT ADMISSIONS

United States Supreme Court; United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York; United States District Court, District of Massachusetts; United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit; United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.