It is increasingly common for insurance companies to include non-negotiable provisions in their standard insurance contracts requiring disputes to be resolved outside of court in confidential arbitrations. Policyholders and other contracting parties often pay no attention to these provisions at the time of contract. But if a dispute arises, these provisions—and their implications—suddenly take center stage. In this program, an experienced panel will review, in a point-counterpoint format, the pros and cons of replacing the publicly available judiciary with privately financed arbitration proceedings.

Listen to our esteemed panel comprised of Andrew Nadolna, a JAMS arbitrator with an almost unmatched specialty in insurance and reinsurance arbitrations, and Rhonda Orin, a partner at Anderson Kill with more than 40 years of experience resolving insurance disputes through trial (bench and jury), arbitration, mediation, and settlement, discuss this very significant issue.